Бытовая техника интернет интернет магазин Фотомаг Харьков. . Изучение английского без проблем - порно онлайн. Ищете интересную online игру?

Consumer Video Tips

Nothing But Information on Today’s Hottest Consumer Video Gear, Tips & Tricks

Canon HV30 Field Test

with 10 comments

canon

I just spent a week shooting with The Canon HV30. It’s a small, but very powerful and affordable camcorder.

I selected this model for use on the Aperture Nature Photography Workshop based on the advice of none other than my pal, Alex Lindsay. Alex is the honcho at Pixelcorps and knows his stuff. He said the HV30 is THE camera to get, if you’re looking for a small handheld and you want to use tape. So I did – get it that is.

Now before I go on, let’s deal with the elephant in the room…

Yes, HD/DV tape is probably on its very last legs. I’d be surprised if in three years we see any new camcorders using tape – so I plan to buy up a nice supply when I see the end near.

But for now, tape is reliable, affordable and easy. Some videographers who’ve purchased HD, or DVD – based recording camcorders have had compatibility issues with video-editing software. You don’t need a special reader or even special software with tape-based cameras. Most computers (as in ALL Mac computers and most Windows computers) come with competent software such as iMovie with which you can pull down and edit the video from a tape-based camera. When I found the right cable (not included!), video transfer to iMovie was a breeze.

The HV30 has a ton of features but some of the highlights to me are:

1. It has external mics – a must-have feature in a camcorder.
2. It allows you to monitor the audio in real time. Another must.
3. It’s compact.
4. It offers 24p, 30fps and 60i frame modes.
5. It has a great LCD
6. It features a wonderful 10x OPTICAL zoom with a range of

f/1.8-f/3.0 offering the following focal lengths:

(Effective focal lengths – EFL)

-43.6mm – 436.0mm (16:9 Movie)
-53.0mm – 530mm (4:3 Movie)

7. There is a front mount 43mm filter diameter which allows for external lenses and filters
8. It has a plethora of connection options including USB, component, firewire and HDMI
9. If you’re a super video HD geek, you can grab UNCOMPRESSED HD video out of the back of the camera using the HDMI port. This feature made my buddy Alex VERY excited.
10. It offers amazing video capture performance in all sorts of conditions, including low-light
11. It has anti-shake that works
12. It has full manual controls available when you want them
13. It has a real viewfinder is included in addition to the swing out LCD
14. It uses a rear mounted joystick makes one-handed operation easy
15. It has a Zebra mode to monitor highlight exposure

The camera is pretty simple to operate. I didn’t even need the manual to figure out most of the features. I prefer the look of 24p and selected the “cinematic” preset. Right out of the box, the video was completely amazing. I was actually stunned that at the quality.

The menus are very intuitive and manual control, while ergonomically challenging to use at times, does work. The joystick is a bit too small for my fat thumb.

I will say that the ability to control audio manually, and to even have an on-screen, real-time audio meter is fantastic. WOW! This is a prosumer-level feature. Audio is SO very important to successful video production and with the HG30, you can achieve some amazing audio results. I’d say without a doubt, that when it comes to camcorders in this price range, nothing challenges the HG30’s audio capability.

I didn’t test the still capabilities of this camera. Why would I? I was carrying a Nikon D3 around my neck :)

But the reports I’ve heard from reliable sources are that like most camcorders, still images are not their bread and butter, but in a pinch, they’ll do.

Battery life was similar to other camcorders I’ve tested – which means you’ll want to buy at least one extra battery to carry around with you when you use this camcorder in the field.

I experimented with the autofocus and the variable zoom on this camcorder. The autofocus was very accurate, but slow in 24p mode. In 30 FPS mode it’s as fast as any other camcorder, which is to say, not as fast as I’d like, but fast enough. The variable zoom takes some getting used to, but works. The more pressure you put on the zoom switch, the faster it zooms. You can also set the zoom speed manually to slow, medium or fast. I prefer slow zooms so I set mine to the slowest speed. Most users will prefer the medium speed.

One of the features that I found helpful was what Canon calls “markers.” These are grid lines that go both horizontally and diagonally across the screen. This feature only works on the LCD. It helps you line up your shots using the rule of thirds aided by a nine-sector grid.

There are a couple of things I didn’t like.

a. There is a plastic cover that hides the hotshoe. It is tethered to the camera using a small piece of plastic. Unfortunately, when trying to mount a shotgun mic to the hotshoe, the cover gets in the way. I had to cut the plastic cord that held it to remove it. That means I’ll lose the cover, but I don’t think that’s too big a deal. In the field, there will always be a mic or a hot-light mounted there, so it won’t be exposed to the elements. It would have been better if they used a longer cord to allow complete removal of that cover so it could be set out of the way.

b. I think that Canon should include the firewire cable you’ll need to download video to most computers. It’s not THAT expensive to throw in a five-foot cable and the hassle of having to drive around to find one (that you didn’t know you’d need) is unnecessary.

c. Larger capacity batteries can get in the way of the viewfinder forcing use of the LCD.

d. No manual gain control – I know, at this price who expects that. But it would be nice.

Believe it or not, shooting several hours with this camcorder still didn’t give me a chance to test all of its features. There are many. But what I did use was great. I’m very happy with this camcorder and while newer models are on the way (aren’t they always?) I am planning on keeping this one for a while. I expect that it will provide me with all I need in the way of video capability until the tape runs out – literally. By then – well you know me…I’ll have upgraded :)

At just over $600, the HV30 is a real winner. If you’re in the market for a powerful hand-held, affordable camcorder, look no further.

I’ll have some test footage up over at the Aperture Nature Photography Workshop page in a few weeks.

Written by scottbourne

January 18, 2009 at 10:24 am

Posted in Gear

Tagged with Canon, Gear, HV30

10 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. You said that the hard drive based (and I would presume the flash based, as well) camcorders tend to have incompatibility issues with editing software. But assuming I have software capable of handling them (Final Cut Express in my case) is there any other advantage to tape media or the cameras? I know one frustrating thing about the Canon hard drive and flash based camcorders is the lack of a manual focus knob but the lightweight and durability of flash or the capacity of a hard drive are both very compelling reasons for those cameras.

    Logan

    January 18, 2009 at 3:29 pm

  2. @Logan there are people who prefer tape because it’s more likely to work across different platforms and systems. But if you have something you like, use it. But the other features of the HV30 often trump those of hard drive or flash based cameras.

    scottbourne

    January 18, 2009 at 3:40 pm

  3. Another bonus I heard about tape versus HD or SD, I’m not completely up on the terminology yet, but the codec is more compressed on the HD and SD memory cameras (AVCHD?). So, with Tape, I hear from videographers on istockvideo.com that you get a higher quality image as well as the compatibility issue you mentioned.

    Is the difference subtle? Probably, but as photographers and artists, we are probably a bit more sensitive to the quality of an image, even if it’s in motion.

    Look forward to seeing your test footage Scott.

    Ed Hidden

    January 18, 2009 at 4:14 pm

  4. Just before xmas our house was broken into and one of the items taken was my Canon Elura 70 that I enjoyed using. Lucky for me insurance had no problem replacing it with an HV30. Amazon had it for something like $530 and change.

    I’ve barely had time to play with it but I’m loving it. I’ve only used it once this last weekend to record my 11 yr old daughter managing to squeak into going to the Pepsi Challenge state competition. Looked good to me.

    One of the major selling point for me though was that it used tapes so I could still use the tapes I had which were not stolen.

    Ed: I read the same thing(somewhere else) but in addition to that I’ve read that if the lighting is a bit low that the HV30 recording to tape tends to look better than the cameras recording to flash which they said was due to the compression scheme.

    Now I’ve got to find a decent inexpensive tripod for it.

    JimH

    January 19, 2009 at 5:04 am

  5. I use a HV30 to create training videos so I like the flexibility of being able to use any of the popular video editing software to edit my clips. However, storage and archiving are also important considerations for me. Based on my camera settings, HDV recordings create approximately a 1G file for every 10 minutes of recording, roughly 6Gs for an hour.

    I have a 1TB network storage drive for backup, but what happens if my network drive becomes unreadable? I lose that data. With miniDV tapes, I can store hundreds of them in a very small fire safe.

    MiniDV quality is better because their is very little compression, but I don’t think the average person will notice.

    The only thing video editors don’t like about tape is the time it takes to download to a computer. It is a 1 to 1 ratio. One minute of tape takes 1 minute to download. However, if you are not editing tape, this is not an issue.

    Hopes this is helpful.

    Tom

    January 19, 2009 at 2:35 pm

  6. I like tapes over drives for several reasons. They are cheap and I can mail a tape to somebody for collaboration. I can keep projects separate and not worry about space. I like to have a simple tape labeling system and can easily find the content I need. But most of all, if a tape breaks, or the camcorder falls of a building, I can repair the physical tape.

    oranse

    January 19, 2009 at 4:20 pm

  7. I have the predecessor HV20 which is nearly identical to the HV30 and I love it. Canon just announced the HV40 which adds true 24p recording (instead of converting to 60i on tape like HV20 and HV30).

    The other elephant in the room is Firewire. I was interested in getting the latest MacBook but it now doesn’t include Firewire and therefore is not usable with the HV20/30.

    Thomas Emmerich

    January 20, 2009 at 1:52 am

  8. I do like the Canon tapeless options, but on a Mac, it’s not so great because not much time is saved on importing, an hour of AVCHD seems to take nearly an hour to ingest anyway. This is the same with iMovie and Final Cut Express & Pro.

    BTW: HDV is about 13GB per hour. It takes even more space on a hard drive if you convert it to Apple Intermediate Codec or ProRes.

    Tape is a good archive format, but losing a hard drive shouldn’t mean losing much data because you’re supposed to be backing it up anyway.

    JeffDM

    January 23, 2009 at 4:30 am

  9. I picked my HV30 up back in September and absolutely love it. Tried a few DVD-based cameras but quickly learned that you have to be way too gentle. When writing to the disc, sudden movements will result in error messages and dropouts.

    Have you taken any of your HD footage and converted it to SD? That’s been a huge challenge, particularly with footage that’s been slowed or slowed and reserves. For example, footage slowed and reversed at 50% (using FCP 2) looks pristine in HD; converting to SD resulted in a very jerky playback. Have tried several variations such as this http://tr.im/deu4

    Appreciate any feedback

    iPodluvr

    January 29, 2009 at 2:03 am

  10. I found a fix to my problem where slowed HDV footage resulted in jerky playback when converted to SD. The SD was generated by creating a DV50 NTSC sequence and dropping my HDV sequence into the DV50 timeline.

    I fixed this by exporting my HDV timeline out with “current settings”. I then re-imported that file and dropped it onto my DV50 timeline. Smooth results.

    iPodluvr

    February 17, 2009 at 2:55 am


Leave a Reply